Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing

By Melissa Mohr

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing "contains original research into the history of swearing, and is scrupulous in analyzing the claims of other scholars."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

A New Manual of French Composition

By R. L. Graeme Ritchie

A New Manual of French Composition "provides a guide to French composition aimed at university students and the higher classes in schools. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Sum: multiple wh-XP interrogatives
Author:  Carsten Breul
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Syntax

Summary:   DEAR ALL

A BIG THANK YOU TO THE 27 PEOPLE WHO HAVE REPLIED TO MY
RECENT QUERY ON MULTIPLE WH-XP INTERROGATIVES (REPEATED
BELOW).

I HAVE TRIED TO CLASSIFY THE JUDGEMENTS ON A FOUR GRADE
SCALE: OK, SLIGHTLY MARGINAL (?), STRONGLY MARGINAL (??-
?*), UNACCEPTABLE (*). SQUEEZING THE REPLIES ONTO THIS
SCALE, I GET THE FOLLLOWING RESULT :

SENTENCE (1): OK: 2; ?: 3; ??-*?: 5; *: 17
SENTENCE (2): OK: 3; ?: 3; ??-*?: 3; *: 18

QUITE A NUMBER OF SPEAKERS WHO FOUND THE SENTENCES
UNACCEPTABLE POINTED OUT THAT THEY ARE POSSIBLE IF PRODUCED
AS A REQUEST FOR REPETITION OF SOMETHING UNHEARD. E.G., IN
THE WORDS OF ONE INFORMANT:

LL Issue: 10.1870
Date Posted: 04-Dec-1999
Original Query: Read original query