Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Summary Details


Query:   Icelandic Phonology
Author:  Antony Dubach Green
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Phonology

Summary:   I would like to thank everyone who responded to my question on Icelandic
phonology, and post a summary of the responses I got.

The following people provided me with answers to my questions:
Birna Arnbjornsdottir <birna@aol.com>
Istvan Bernath <bernath@euroweb.hu>
Haraldur Bernhardsson <hb17@cornell.edu>
Jakob Dempsey <jakob@saturn.yzu.edu.tw>
Lance Eccles <leccles@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Thorsteinn G. Indridason <torsteinn.indridason@nor.uib.no>
Nicholas Jones <nj@home.cam.net.uk>
Wolfgang Kehrein <kehrein@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
Magnus Petursson via Janina Schuldt <jschuldt@rrz.uni-hamburg.de>

The questions and their summarized answers are these:
>(1) Am I correct in assuming that the orthographic <d~t> contrastis
>word-initially one of aspiration rather than voicing? I.e. <d> in <dag> 'day'
>represents a voiceless unaspirated stop; while <t> in <tala> 'to speak' a
>voiceless aspirated stop.

Everyone agrees this is true.

>(2) Am I correct in assuming that intervocalic <t> is actually UNaspirated?
>E.g. in a word like <gata> 'street', the <t> represents the same sound as is
>found at the beginning of <dag>, NOT the same as is found at the beginning of
><tala>.

This is true for the southern dialect. In the northern dialect, the <t> of
<gata> is aspirated.

>(3) Are there any words in Icelandic with intervocalic orthographic <d> (not
>counting morpheme-initial d after a prefix or in a compound)? A quick glance
>through an Icelandic dictionary reveals lots of <d-> (edh) in this position,
>but I couldn't find any <d>. If <d> does occur in this position, how is it
>pronounced? Does it merge with the <t> of <gata>?

Single intervocalic <d> in Icelandic seems to be found only in loanwords,
e.g. Lada (a Russian make of car), py/rami/di 'pyramid' [/ indicates acute
accent over preceding vowel], radar 'radar', radi/us 'radius', etc. It is
pronounced as an unaspirated voiceless stop, and thus merges with the <t> of
<gata> in the southern dialect.

>(4) I have found a word-internal orthographic <d~t> contrast in the context
>l_r: <heldri> 'notable' vs. <haltra> 'to hang'. Is there still a phonetic
>difference between the d and the t? If so, what is it?

In the southern dialect, there is no phonetic difference between the d and
the t in these words; however the l in <heldri> is voiced while the l in
<haltra> is devoiced. I also need to correct a gloss: <haltra> means 'to
limp', not 'to hang'. The book I got this from is written in German and
glosses <haltra> as 'hinken', which means 'to limp'. But I wasn't paying
close enough attention, and thought it said 'henken', which means 'to hang'.
In the northern dialect again, the <d> is unaspirated and the <t> aspirated.

>(5) Are there any other relevant examples, e.g. -Vdr- vs. -Vtr-?

No, but there are interesting contrasts between -Vddr- and -Vtr-: <saddra>
'satisfied' (gen. pl.) is pronounced [satra] with a short vowel, indicating
that the initial syllable is closed, although the consonant is not
pronounced as a geminate. Meanwhile, <titra> 'to tremble' is pronounced
[tI:tra] with a long vowel, indicating that the initial syllable is open. A
parallel contrast is found between -Vggv- and -Vkv-: <ho"ggva> [o" =
o-umlaut] 'to hew' is [h#kva] [# = lower-mid front rounded vowel] with a
short vowel, while <vo"kva> 'to water' is [v#:kva] with a long vowel.

Finally, I would like to mention the following resources mentioned by
respondents:

Einarsson, Stefan (1945). _Icelandic: Grammar, Texts, Glossary_. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins Press.

Fridjonsson (1984). _Phonetics of Modern Icelandic_.

Haugen, E. (1982). _Scandinavian Language Structures_.

Kress, Bruno (1982). _Islaendische Grammatik_. Leipzig: Enzyklopaedie.

Petursson, Magnus (1978). _Islaendisch: Eine Uebersicht ueber die moderne
islaendische Sprache mit einem kurzen Abriss der Geschichte und Literatur
Islands._ Hamburg: Buske.

Many thanks for your help!

Antony D. Green
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Antony Dubach Green green@zas.gwz-berlin.de
Zentrum fuer Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Jaegerstr. 10/11 Tel (+49 30) 20 192 574
10117 Berlin
Deutschland Fax (+49 30) 20 192 402

GO MAIRE NA TEANGACHA CEILTEACHA! BYWIO YR IEITHOEDD CELTAIDD!

LL Issue: 9.264
Date Posted: 22-Feb-1998
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page