Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule

New from Cambridge University Press!


Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.

New from Brill!


Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin

Query Details

Query Subject:   Onset [r] Deletion in English
Author:   Nancy Hall
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Phonology

Query:   Some English words are occasionally pronounced with deletion of an onset
[r]. Examples include the following (thanks to Maria Gouskova and Linda
Hall for pointing some of these out):

February -> Febuary (this is pretty much standard)
veterinarian -> vetinarian
Tristram Shandy -> Tristam Shandy
respiratory -> respitory
spectrogram -> spectogram
secretary -> secetary
extraordinary -> extodinary (Fiona Apple sings this in
''Extraordinary Machine'')

[A blogging Apple fan comments on this last one, ``For some reason I really
like her pronunciation of Extraordinary. It becomes ''extordinary'' because
no one on the planet can sing Extraordinary, it's a terrible word.''

Although this deletion seems to be sporadic, the examples above
share certain traits, suggesting there is a phonological basis for the
deletion. For example, each word contains more than one onset [r], and the
[r] that deletes is in a complex onset in a non-initial syllable. Usually
it's unstressed, and usually it precedes the other [r].

I would be grateful to anyone who can point out 1) any published or
unpublished work on onset [r] deletion; 2) any other examples of onset [r]
deletion that you may have noticed (whether or not they are similar to the
examples above). I will post a summary if there is sufficient interest.

--Nancy Hall
LL Issue: 17.2084
Date posted: 18-Jul-2006


Sums main page