Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Query Details


Query Subject:   Eng adjectives
Author:   umesaki umesaki
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Pragmatics
Semantics

Query:   I am working on English adjectives. Are the following sentences
acceptable? If acceptable, please mark them with a check. If not
acceptable, please mark them with a cross. If uncertain or dubious,
please mark them with a question mark. Any comment is welcome.

(1) John was careful to lock the door.
(2) John was greedy to keep all the money to himself.
(3) John was worthy to be praised by them all.
(4) The place is convenient to visit.
(5) John is jealous that she succeeded.
(6) John was bored to hear her endless talk.
(7) John was confused to be told to do so many things at once.
(8) John was hurt to be insulted.
(9) I am eager that they should win.
(10) John was incredulous that Mary put it into practice.
(11) Mary is keen that we should go.
(12) It was heroic of them to oppose the invader.
(13) John was irresponsible to sabotage his duties.
(14) It is significant that they worked as volunteers.
(15) It is sufficient to give him some money.
(16) It is not suitable to dress casual at a wedding reception.

Atsuko Umesaki (umesaki@tezukayama-u.ac.jp)
./
LL Issue: 8.1047
Date posted: 12-Jul-1997



Back

Sums main page