Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Vowel Length From Latin to Romance

By Michele Loporcaro

This book "draws on extensive empirical data, including from lesser known varieties" and "puts forward a new account of a well-known diachronic phenomenon."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Letter Writing and Language Change

Edited By Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier, and Richard J. Watts

This book "challenges the assumption that there is only one 'legitimate' and homogenous form of English or of any other language" and "supports the view of different/alternative histories of the English language and will appeal to readers who are skeptical of 'standard' language ideology."


Academic Paper


Title: Phrasal Disjunction in Russian and Danish
Paper URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00806765.2012.740245
Author: Elena Lorentzen
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: http://tors.ku.dk/ansatte/beskrivelse/?id=51751
Institution: University of Copenhagen
Linguistic Field: Cognitive Science; Discipline of Linguistics; Pragmatics; Syntax; Typology
Subject Language: Danish
Russian
Abstract: It is widely assumed that “And-But-Or” languages exploit a universal strategy for connecting phrasal coordinands due to the fact that coordination is considered basic and universal to human mind and that the coordinators And and Or are equivalent to logical connectives. However, a contrastive study of Russian and Danish reveals significant differences between the two languages in choice of type of phrasal coordination in utterances used to describe one and the same type of situation. It appears that disjunction in Danish corresponds consistently to conjunction as well as disjunction in Russian, which cannot be accounted for by existing global formal semantic and pragmatic theories. In this paper I propose a new approach to phrasal coordination in general and disjunction in particular based on Durst-Andersen’s cognitive-semiotic theory of linguistic supertypes, according to which Russian is a reality-oriented language with a third-person-oriented speaker and Danish is a hearer-oriented language with a second-person-oriented speaker. I claim that the use of disjunction and conjunction in these languages is determined by their essential properties as two different supertypes, viz. by ground-situational nature of linguistic structures in Russian, the grammar of which functions as a model of situations in reality, and by ground-propositional nature of linguistic structures in Danish, the grammar of which functions as a signal to the hearer to find situations behind the speaker’s information.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Scando-Slavica, volume 58, issue 2, 2012, p. 195-230.
URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00806765.2012.740245


Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page