Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing

By Melissa Mohr

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing "contains original research into the history of swearing, and is scrupulous in analyzing the claims of other scholars."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

A New Manual of French Composition

By R. L. Graeme Ritchie

A New Manual of French Composition "provides a guide to French composition aimed at university students and the higher classes in schools. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Academic Paper


Title: Het gebruik van het Brugse dialoogpartikel dè (/dæ/)
Paper URL: http://www.neerlandistiek.nl/03.01/
Author: Bert Cappelle
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/sitespersonnels/cappelle/
Institution: Université Lille - Nord de France
Linguistic Field: Language Documentation; Pragmatics
Subject Language: Dutch
Dutch
Dutch
Dutch
Abstract: This study exhaustively describes the usage of the dialogic particle dè in the Bruges dialect (as in Zie je do weeëre dè? 'Oh, here you are again!'). The text first presents a critical survey of previous traditional lexicographic descriptions and more formal linguistic attempts at analysing the interpretation of this discourse particle. It then provides a new, mainly corpus-based description of the placement, the syntactic distribution, the interpretation, and the constraints on the use of dè. The invariable semantic contribution of dè is rather scant: dè indicates that the speaker wants to react to something just said or to something perceptible in the speech situation. Though utterances with dè typically betray the speaker's heightened emotionality, it appears that a sense of surprise, which is usually claimed to be an inherent part of its semantics, is not always present. Moreover, it is not always the case that a wh-question with dè exempts the hearer from providing a specific value for the "X" represented by the wh-word. Knowing how to reply co-operatively to a wh-question with dè requires some amount of common sense reasoning on the part of the hearer. I argue for the necessity to describe dè with reference to the sentence types in which it can occur (e.g. yes/no-questions, statements, etc.). Although any given two types with dè share one or more properties, for each type there are special possibilities or restrictions that need stating explicitly.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Neerlandistiek.nl 03(01)
URL: http://www.neerlandistiek.nl/03.01/


Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page