Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Words in Time and Place: Exploring Language Through the Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary

By David Crystal

Offers a unique view of the English language and its development, and includes witty commentary and anecdotes along the way.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases

By Peter Mark Roget

This book "supplies a vocabulary of English words and idiomatic phrases 'arranged … according to the ideas which they express'. The thesaurus, continually expanded and updated, has always remained in print, but this reissued first edition shows the impressive breadth of Roget's own knowledge and interests."


New from Brill!

ad

The Brill Dictionary of Ancient Greek

By Franco Montanari

Coming soon: The Brill Dictionary of Ancient Greek by Franco Montanari is the most comprehensive dictionary for Ancient Greek to English for the 21st Century. Order your copy now!


Academic Paper


Title: Anaphoric Reference in Early Modern English: the case of said and same
Author: Alex Ho-Cheong Leung
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/sass/about/humanities/linguistics/linguisticsstaff/alexleung1/
Institution: Northumbria University
Author: Wim van der Wurff
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/elll/people/profile/w.a.m.van-der-wurff
Institution: University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Linguistic Field: Historical Linguistics
Abstract: In this paper we investigate NPs of the form the said + N and the same, as in (1) and (2)./L//L/(1) all the olde holy doctours [...], that [...] expowne the sayde wordes of Chryste to be ment of the very eatynge of hys flesshe (EEBO, 1533, T. More, The answere)/L/(2) nat only whan thou hast the consolacion of grace: but whan thou with humylyte sufferest the subtraccion of the same (EEBO, 1517, W. Atkinson, A treatyse)/L//L/In (1), the word said signals that the NP refers back to an entity already mentioned. In (2), the expression the same is also anaphoric. It may convey some added emphatic force (Rissanen 1999: 196) but as the OED s.v. same B4a says, it is basically expresses 'the aforesaid person or thing; often merely the equivalent of a personal pronoun'./L/ /L/Frequency data for these two anaphoric expressions in EModE show a gradual increase followed by a decline. The reason for this, we will argue, lies in functional factors having to do with the overall system of referring expressions./L/ /L/The model we will use is that of Gundel et al (1993) (see also Ariel 1990, 2001, 2004). It posits a Givenness Hierarchy as in (3)./L//L/(3) category: in > activated > familiar > uniquely > referential > type/L/ focus identifiable identifiable/L//L/ form: personal that/this/ that N the N indefinite a N/L/ pronoun this N this N/L//L/The categories show the cognitive status of referents; the forms are the ones appropriate for referring to the relevant entities in PDE. As Gundel et al (1993) point out, forms can also be used to refer to entities higher up the hierarchy. Their data show that in PDE the form the + N in particular is quite versatile: of 280 tokens, from a variety of texts, 30 had referents that were uniquely identifiable, 47 familiar, 95 activated and 30 in focus. Investigation of EModE data suggests that the + N was similarly variable in this period. /L/ /L/We will argue that it is this variability of the + N that caused the increase in frequency of the expressions the said + N and the same in EModE. Unlike the + N, they were unambiguous markers of activated or in-focus status of their referents and underwent incipient grammaticalisation in this function – a fairly natural development, since both expressions come from sources that focus on referential identity./L/ /L/However, another property of the forms might work against the development. Briefly, they are somewhat long for the limited amount of information they convey. It is well established (see Gundel et al 1993: 285 and Ariel 1990: 81-83 for) that categories higher up the givenness hierarchy generally tend to be shorter. From this perspective the two forms in (1) and (2) are not ideal. In establishing themselves as conventional forms for picking out in-focus or activated referents, the same and the said + N would be competing with it, this, that, this + N and the +N, which are all either shorter or more informative. It is this factor, we argue, which prevented the full grammaticalisation of the forms and ultimately led to their decline.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Venue: Newcastle University, U.K.
Publication Info: Paper at The 2nd International Workshop on the Structure of the Noun Phrase in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Explorations (NP2)


Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page