Editor for this issue: <>
A month or so ago I asked LINGUIST-readers for the difference between so- called cognitive linguistics and (other kinds of) linguistics. I worked most of the replies I got into a coherent text which I will be happy to send to anyone on request (preferably as a textfile via e-mail). I have decided against sending the lot to the list as it may be a little lengthy. --------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Bert Peeters Tel: +61 02 202344 Department of Modern Languages 002 202344 University of Tasmania at Hobart Fax: 002 207813 GPO Box 252C Bert.PeetersMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemodlang.utas.edu.au Hobart TAS 7001 Australia
I cannot help but be amazed by the large amount of interest (and postings) on the barber's paradox. The only relevance I can see this paradox has to linguistics is that it reflects the fact that mathematical logic is of very little relevance to the study of natural human language (or whatever it's called now). Please correct me if I'm wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Aske Jon Aske Department of Linguistics Political Science/Anthropology University of California OR Bates College Berkeley, CA 94720 Lewiston, ME 04240 jonaskeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuegarnet.berkeley.edu jaske
abacus.bates.edu -------------------------------------------------------------------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS
May I just point out that, according to Hockett, Bloomfield at one point thought he could show that some of the stuff in set theory (perhaps it was Cantor's work, I don't now recall) rested on a linguistic equivocation. The story is that Bloomfield started writing this up, then realized that he did not know what he talking about (or something like that), and apparently proceed to use the backs of the same pages for some other purpose. I always HAVE admired Bloomfield so.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 92 9:39:34 EDT > From: Randy Allen Harris <rahaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuewatarts.uwaterloo.ca> > There is a new movie, a documentary which premiered at Toronto's > movie festival this year, that might be of interest: _Manufacturing > Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media_. The line-ups were long, > and the only review I've seen ("The Scholar from another Planet", > in the 2 October issue of Canada's national paper, _The Globe and > Mail_) is pretty favorable. I haven't seen it. I saw a working cut at a preview last November. There were some rough spots, but mostly it's a very good movie. However, as you might expect from the title, it's about Chomsky's political side, specifically his critique of the media, as articulated in works like _Manufacturing Consent_ and _Necessary Illusions_. -30- Bob Ingria