* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.3450

Sun Aug 29 2010

Calls: Syntax/Netherlands

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <dilinguistlist.org>

LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
        1.    Hedde Zeijlstra, Verb Movement: Its nature, triggers, and effects

Message 1: Verb Movement: Its nature, triggers, and effects
Date: 29-Aug-2010
From: Hedde Zeijlstra <zeijlstrauva.nl>
Subject: Verb Movement: Its nature, triggers, and effects
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Verb Movement: Its nature, triggers, and effects

Date: 10-Dec-2010 - 11-Dec-2010
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Contact Person: Kristine Bentzen
Meeting Email: vmovehsl.uit.no
Web Site: http://castl.uit.no/index.php?

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax

Call Deadline: 13-Oct-2010

Meeting Description:

In this workshop we want to address various issues related to verb
placement and the syntax of the left periphery. The topic 'verb movement'
has of course been discussed extensively in the linguistic literature, but
many of the core properties of verb movement still trigger intense debates
and we think it is about time to try to determine what the main issues are
and take a new look at them through 2010 goggles. For one thing, the
empirical basis for traditional verb movement analyses has mainly consisted
of (standard varieties of) Germanic and Romance languages, in particular
English, German, Dutch, Scandinavian, and French. However, more
detailed knowledge about other languages and dialects has enlarged the
empirical basis. One such example is the extensive work on European
dialects conducted in the last decade or so, partly in research groups that
have been a part of the NORMS project or associated with it. These new
data challenge the traditional view of verb movement as simply V-to-C or V-
to-I. On the theoretical side, one issue concerns the 'explosion' of the CP
and IP domains. Since (among others) Pollock (1989), Rizzi (1997), and
Cinque (1999) it is commonly assumed that the structure of the CP and IP
domains is much more fine-grained than we previously thought, with several
functional projections in each domain. As a result, for example 'V-to-C' can
no longer be assumed to be one single phenomenon; rather, we need to
consider e.g. V-to-Fin, V-to-Foc, V-to-Top, V-to-Force, etc. as variants of
what used to be labeled 'V-to-C'. Likewise, 'V-to-I' could mean V-to-Asp, V-
to-T, V-to-Mod, etc. Another theoretical issue that is still under debate is the
nature of the movement operation itself. Traditionally, verb movement has of
course been analysed as head movement, but during the last decade or
more, many people have explored phrasal movement alternatives such as
remnant movement to account for verb movement. Related to this is the
question of what triggers verb movement. The long-standing view that
verbal morphology is a trigger for verb movement has been challenged in
recent years, but the debate on this issue has by no means come to an end.
Finally, the potential semantic effects of verb movement is also an issue that
deserves more scrutiny. Invited speakers include: Jan-Wouter Zwart
(Groningen) Winfried Lechner (Athens) Ora Matushansky (Utrecht) Klaus
Abels (UCL) Theresa Biberauer (Cambridge).

Call For Papers

We invite abstracts of papers related to all questions listed in the workshop

One person can submit at most one abstract as a sole author and one as
co-author. Abstracts should be anonymous, in form of a PDF file, at most 2
pages in length, including examples and references, using a 12 pt. font with
2.5 cm (or 1 inch) margins on all sides.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 29-Aug-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.