* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.1659

Tue Apr 06 2010

Diss: Lang Acq: Dilans: 'Oral Corrective Feedback and L2 Vocabulary...'

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <dilinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
        1.    Gatis Dilans, Oral Corrective Feedback and L2 Vocabulary Development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom

Message 1: Oral Corrective Feedback and L2 Vocabulary Development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom
Date: 05-Apr-2010
From: Gatis Dilans <gatis.dilansgmail.com>
Subject: Oral Corrective Feedback and L2 Vocabulary Development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom
E-mail this message to a friend

Institution: University of Texas at San Antonio
Program: Culture, Literacy and Language
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2010

Author: Gatis Dilans

Dissertation Title: Oral Corrective Feedback and L2 Vocabulary Development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom

Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition

Subject Language(s): English (eng)

Dissertation Director:
Shannon Sauro
Juliet Langman

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation study investigated the effects of oral corrective
feedback in the form of prompts and recasts (Ammar, 2008; Ammar &
Spada, 2006; Lyster, 2004; Lyster & Izquerdo, 2009) on second
language (L2) vocabulary development (de la Fuente, 2002; Ellis & He,
1999; Ellis, Tanaka, & Yamazaki, 1994). A population of intermediate
adult learners of English as a second language (ESL) in a community
college located in the US Southwest was used.

The quasi-experimental study used pretest-posttest-delayed posttest
design. The participants (n = 23) were conviniently selected and
designated to three groups: prompts, recasts, and control. The
treatment consisted of a four-step vocabulary activity during which
prompts, recasts or no feedback was provided, respectively. The
treatment outcomes were tested in terms of measures based on an
adaptation of a three-dimensional second language vocabulary
development model (Henriksen, 1999, 2008) and in-group proficiency.
Data includes treatment session transcriptions, a revised and combined
2000/University Word Level Test (Beglar & Hunt, 1999), pretest,
posttest, delayed posttest, and longer-delayed posttest, plus a
background questionnaire. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance
(RM ANOVA), Repeated Measures Multivariate Analysis of Variance
(RM MANOVA), correlations, plus pair-samples t-tests and multiple and
linear regressions were conducted to analyze the results.

The findings appear to indicate that prompts were equally beneficial in
short term and slightly more advantageous in a longer term than
recasts in facilitating L2 vocabulary development for community college
adult ESL learners. However, from both corrective feedback (CF)
groups, only the prompts group demonstrated significant increases on
all three dimensions of L2 vocabulary development as they were
operationalized for this study.

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $65,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Space Fund 
Drive 2010 and join us for a great journey!


There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to: 

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit: 

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as 
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These 
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return 
(U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact 
your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match 
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your 
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the 
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple 
administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without 
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if your company 
operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.