From: Brian Murphy <brian.murphyunitn.it>
Subject: NAACL 2010 Workshop on Computational Neurolinguistics
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: NAACL 2010 Workshop on Computational Neurolinguistics
Date: 05-Jun-2010 - 06-Jun-2010
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact Person: Brian Murphy
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://sites.google.com/site/compneurowsnaacl10/
Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Computational Linguistics; Neurolinguistics
Call Deadline: 10-Mar-2010
The first Workshop on Computational Neurolinguistics will be held at NAACL next June in Los Angeles. Invited speakers will introduce the audience to the fundamentals of neurolinguistics, and computational models of neural activity.
Computational neurolinguistics is an emerging research area which integrates recent advances in computational linguistics and cognitive neuroscience, with the objective of developing cognitively plausible models of language and gaining a better understanding of the human language system. It builds on research in decoding cognitive states from recordings of neural activity, and computational models of lexical representations and sentence processing. Published work in this area includes the discovery of semantic features in neural activity (Mitchell et al, 2008), using brain signals for the relative evaluation of corpus semantic models (Murphy et al, 2009), and recognizing the semantics of adjective-noun meaning composition (Chang et al, 2009).
On-going research focuses on a number of topics such as brain-computer interfaces to provide dictation systems for paraplegic patients, and algorithms to perform tagging and shallow parsing of neural activity recorded during sentence comprehension. Both computational linguistics and neuroscience stand to gain from these techniques. In computational linguistics, the cognitive plausibility of language models has primarily been evaluated against collections of subjective intuitions (e.g. semantic feature norms, grammaticality judgments, corpus annotations, dictionaries). Evaluation of the large body of Computational Linguistics work based on data driven distributional approaches has also relied on hand-crafted resources such as WordNet or data sets manually tagged with a predefined list of categories. Comparison with neural data may provide a more objective yardstick for both models and resources. And in brain imaging, language-related research has often been limited to relatively coarse analyses (e.g. high level features such as animacy or part-of-speech) but now computational neurolinguistic methods have leveraged the richness of corpus-based descriptions to extract finer-grained representations for single lexemes.
Advances in computational neurolinguistics require close collaboration between computational linguists and neuroscientists. To this end, an interdisciplinary workshop can play a key role in advancing existing and initiating new research. We hope that it will attract an interdisciplinary target audience consisting of computational linguists, machine learning researchers, computational neuroscientists and cognitive scientists.
Call for Papers:
New: Submission deadline extended to March 10, 2010
Workshop on Computational Neurolinguistics
5 or 6 June, NAACL-HLT 2010, Los Angeles
The first Workshop on Computational Neurolinguistics will be held at NAACL next June in Los Angeles. We welcome submissions on the computational treatment of any aspect of language, that either makes use of neural recordings or of biologically realistic neuronal models. To encourage submissions from the broadest community, the organisers are releasing two neural activity datasets, fMRI and EEG, described below. Submissions should be made through the NAACL system, with a deadline of March 10th, 2010:
Topics of Interest:
-Computational Linguistic Focus
o Word-level analyses (e.g. corpus semantic models, lexica, lexical relations and ontologies, parts-of-speech, word senses, morphology)
o Phrase-level analyses (e.g. word compounds, meaning composition in multi-word expressions)
-Machine Learning Focus
o Decoding of cognitive states from neural activity
o Feature selection and data mining techniques for decoding linguistic information
-Neural Science Focus
o Brain imaging techniques: fMRI, EEG, MEG, NIRS, including cross-modality analysis (e.g. combining fMRI and EEG)
o Localizing Regions of Interest (e.g. identify the roles / functions of brain regions)
-Cognitive Science Focus
o Comparisons with behavioral (e.g. priming experiments, eye-tracking, self-paced reading) and elicited data (e.g. semantic feature norms)
o Biologically plausible connectionist approaches
Submissions based on any data-sets or tasks are welcomed, and originality of approach is encouraged. However, to assist researchers who are new to this topic, we are providing the data used in Mitchell et al. (2008) and Murphy et al. (2009), as well as a number of sample shared tasks. Submissions are welcome that follows the tasks in whole or in part, or simply to use them as an evaluation baseline for their own work. Performance will not be independently validated by the organizers, and will only be one of the criteria used to select among submissions.
-The CMU fMRI data-set of 60 concrete concepts, in 12 categories, collected while nine English speakers were presented with 60 line drawings of objects with text labels and were instructed to think of the same properties of the stimulus object consistently during each presentation. For each concept there are 6 instances of ~20k neural activity features (brain blood oxygenation levels):
-The Trento EEG data-set for 60 concept concepts, in 2 categories (work tools and land mammals), collected while seven Italian speakers were silently naming photographic images that represent these concepts. For each concept there are 6 instances of ~15k neural activity features (spectral power in voltage signals):
Sample Shared Tasks:
As noted above, submissions on any task are welcomed, and these tasks are primarily intended to provide a possible starting point for researchers who are new to the topic.
-Concept-pair neural discrimination task: For two concepts randomly left out of training, teach a classifier to match recorded neural data to the correct lexeme. This may be achieved by taking advantage of corpus-based models of word meaning, as in published research, or otherwise. This task is based on the evaluation method used with fMRI data in Mitchell et al. (2008), and replicated with EEG data in Murphy et al. (2009).
-Corpus semantic model evaluation task: Teach a classifier to predict the neural activity observed for single concepts, based on each of several corpus semantic models. The average similarity between observed activity and predicted activity over all concepts can be taken as metric of corpus model fidelity.
March 10, 2010: Deadline for submission of workshop papers
March 30, 2010: Notification of acceptance
April 12, 2010: Camera-ready papers due
June 5 or 6, 2010: Workshop date
Authors are invited to submit full papers on original, unpublished work in the topic area of this workshop via the NAACL submission site:
Submissions should be formatted using the NAACL 2010 stylefiles, with blind review and not exceeding 8 pages plus an extra page for references. The stylefiles are available at http://naaclhlt2010.isi.edu/authors.html. The PDF files will be submitted electronically through the NAACL submission system, the link will be available later. Each submission will be reviewed at least by two members of the programme committee. Accepted papers will be published in the workshop proceedings. Dual submissions to the main NAACL 2010 conference and this workshop are allowed; if you submit to the main session, indicate this when you submit to the workshop. If your paper is accepted for the main session, you should withdraw your paper from the workshop upon notification by the main session.
-Brian Murphy, brian.murphy at unitn.it
Centre for Mind/Brain Studies, University of Trento
-Kai-min Kevin Chang, kaimin.chang at gmail.com
Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
-Anna Korhonen, alk23 at cam.ac.uk
Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge
-Afra Alishahi, Saarland University, Germany
-Ben Amsel, University of Toronto, Canada
-Stefano Anzellotti, Harvard University, USA
-Colin Bannard, University of Texas Austin, USA
-Marco Baroni, University of Trento, Italy
-Gemma Boleda, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain
-Ina Bornkessel, Max Planck Leipzig, Germany
-Augusto Buchweitz, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
-George Cree, University of Toronto, Canada
-Barry Devereux, University of Cambridge, UK
-Katrin Erk, University of Texas Austin, USA
-Stefan Evert, Unversity of Osnabrück, Germany
-Adele Goldberg, Princeton University, USA
-Chu-Ren Huang, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
-Aravind Joshi, University of Pennsylvania, USA
-Marcel Just, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
-Frank Keller, University of Edinburgh, UK
-Charles Kemp, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
-Mirella Lapata, University of Edinburgh, UK
-Chia-Ying Lee, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
-Roger Levy, University of California Sand Diego, USA
-Angelika Lingnau, University of Trento, Italy
-Brad Mahon, University of Rochester, USA
-Robert Mason, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
-Diana McCarthy, Lexical Computing Ltd, UK
-Ken McRae, University of Western Ontario, Canada
-Tom Mitchell, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
-Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin, University of Provence, France
-Sebastian Padò, University of Stuttgart, Germany
-Francisco Periera, Princeton University, USA
-Massimo Poesio, University of Trento, Italy
-Thierry Poibeau, University of Paris 13, France
-Dean Pomerleau, Intel Labs Pittsburgh, USA
-Ari Rappoport, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
-Brian Roark, Oregeon Health & Science University, USA
-Kenji Sagae, University of Southern California, USA
-Hinrich Schütze, Stuttgart University, Germany
-Sabine Schulte im Walde, University of Stuttgart, Germany
-Svetlana Shinkareva, University of South Carolina, USA
-Nathaniel Smith, University of San Diego, USA
-Aline Villavicencio, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
-David Vinson, University College London, UK
-Yang ChinLung, City University of Hong Kong, China
This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $65,000. This money will go to help
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.
See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Space Fund
Drive 2010 and join us for a great journey!
There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!
You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at
Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to:
For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:
The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return
(U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact
your financial advisor.
Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple
administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if your company
operates such a program.
Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue