LINGUIST List 19.1385
|
Thu Apr 24 2008
TOC: Languages in Contrast 8/1 (2008)
Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi
<fatemeh linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Paul
Peranteau,
Languages in Contrast Vol 8, No 1 (2008)
Message 1: Languages in Contrast Vol 8, No 1 (2008)
|
Date: 22-Apr-2008
From: Paul Peranteau <paul benjamins.com>
Subject: Languages in Contrast Vol 8, No 1 (2008)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Journal Title: Languages in Contrast
Volume Number: 8
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2008
Main Text:
Languages in Contrast 8:1 2008. 148 pp. Table of contents Articles An analysis of progressive aspect in French and Dutch in terms of Variation and Specialization Liesbeth Mortier 1–20 Sentence splitting and discourse structure in translations Kåre Solfjeld 21–46 L1 effects on the emergence of ESL sentence processing skills of Chinese and Korean ESL learners: A preliminary study Michael Fender 47–73 Aspect selection in adult L2 Spanish and the Competing Systems Hypothesis: When pedagogical and linguistic rules conflict Jason Rothman 74–106 Three English adverbs and their formal equivalents in Romance languages: A corpus-based collocational study Christopher S. Butler 107–124 Reviews Stig Johansson, Seeing through Multilingual Corpora. On the use of corpora in contrastive studies Reviewed by Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen 125–129 Hélène Chuquet and Michel Paillard, Causalité et contrastivité. Etudes de corpus Reviewed by Diana M. Lewis 130–133 Karsten Rinas, Die Abtönungspartikeln doch und ja. Semantik, Idiomatisierung, Kombinationen, tschechische Äquivalente Reviewed by Volker Gast 134–141
Linguistic Field(s):
Discourse Analysis
Language Acquisition
Semantics
Syntax
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Computational Linguistics
General Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|