LINGUIST List 19.1313
|
Fri Apr 18 2008
Calls: General Ling,Typology/Germany; General Ling,Syntax/Germany
Editor for this issue: F. Okki Kurniawan
<okki linguistlist.org>
|
As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations
or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in
the text. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Hole
Daniel,
Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus
2. Daniel
Hole,
Theoretical East Asian Linguistics 5
Message 1: Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus
|
Date: 18-Apr-2008
From: Hole Daniel <hole uni-potsdam.de>
Subject: Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus Date: 14-Nov-2008 - 15-Nov-2008 Location: Potsdam, Germany Contact Person: Daniel Hole Meeting Email: hole uni-potsdam.de Web Site: http://www.sfb632.uni-potsdam.de/events3322.html Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Typology Call Deadline: 01-Jun-2008 Meeting Description: A two-day workshop will be held at Potsdam University as part of the activities within the special research group SFB 632 'Information Structure', funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG). The workshop aims at bringing together descriptive and theoretical perspectives on the analysis of predicate focus, where we understand predicate focus as a cover term for a number of related, or even identical phenomena that are discussed in the literature under various headings, such as verum focus, auxiliary focus, polarity focus, focus on tense and aspect, event focus, and narrow focus on the lexical verb. What all these instances of predicate focus have in common is that they are used to highlight aspects of the verbal or functional meaning of a clause, as opposed to the highlighting of arguments and adjuncts, which figures more prominently in the literature. 2nd Call for Papers - Workshop on Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus: Similarities and Differences Among the many interesting aspects of predicate focus are the following: - Crosslinguistically, predicate focus is often grammatically unmarked and subject to contextual resolution: Why is predicate focus not obligatorily marked? - If marked, predicate foci tend to involve non-canonical strategies that differ from focus marking on arguments and adjuncts. A frequently attested means of marking predicate focus is the use of specific (ad)verbal focus markers in form of special stem forms, inflections, affixes, or adverbal particles. Additional means of marking predicate focus include nominalization, sometimes accompanied by movement, or particular morphological markers: Why is predicate focus marked differently from nominal argument/adjunct focus? - Some languages show an affinity between focus on the truth value, on the tense/aspect, and on the lexical verb in that all three instances of focus are grammatically marked in the same way: What are the structural or semantic reasons behind this affinity? - Some languages mark predicate focus and all-new/thetic utterances in the same way: What is the semantic connection between theticity and predicate focus? - In some languages, discourse particles can be used for emphasizing the truth or factualness of the event reported, so that they look like markers of verum/polarity focus: What is the semantic relation between discourse particles and markers of predicate focus? From a semantic point of view it is not clear why predicate focus should differ from argument/ adjunct focus. While predicate focus involves semantically unsaturated expressions and might therefore involve more complexity in the focus semantic component, the modeling of predicate focus as such is not different from that of argument foci. One goal of the workshop is therefore to explore what are the structural or semantic factors behind the special behavior of predicate focus. We invite submissions reporting on descriptive and/or theoretical work relating to the structural and semantic nature of predicate focus. We particularly encourage submissions that include discussions of lesser investigated languages. In addition to the various issues raised above, contributions to the workshop could focus on, but are not limited to, the following questions: - What are the possible focus readings observed with verb-specific focus markers expressing predicate focus in different languages? - Is it possible to give a unified account of the meaning contribution of such verb-specific focus markers in different languages? - How are verb focus, auxiliary focus and verum/polarity focus expressed in isolating languages, e.g. in South East Asian? - Is there really a systematic ambiguity between narrow focus on the verb, on the one hand, and focus on tense/aspect or the truth value, on the other? - How do markers of predicate focus interact with other grammatical categories, such as negation, argument/adjunct focus, sentence type and aspect? - Can markers of predicate focus occur in embedded environments? - To what extent can discourse particles be used as markers of predicate focus? Invited speaker: Tom Güldemann (Universität Zürich) We are planning to have slots of 45 minutes per speaker, including 10 minutes of discussion. Depending on the number of accepted papers, the organizers reserve the right to reduce the individual slots to 35 minutes. Abstract submissions should reach us no later than 1 June 2008. An author may submit at most one single and one joint abstract. Abstracts must be at most 2 pages in 12-point font with 1'' margins, including data and references. Authors are requested to submit an anonymous copy of the abstract as pdf-attachment to the following address: hole uni-potsdam.de. The name of the pdf file should be the author(s)'s name(s): name.pdf The body of the email should contain the following information: 1. Name(s) of author(s) 2. Title of talk 3. Affiliation(s) 4. E-mail address(es) Important dates: 1 June 2008: deadline for abstract submissions 15 July 2008: notification of acceptance 14-15 November 2008: Workshop in Potsdam Local organizers: Daniel Hole (Universität Potsdam) Malte Zimmermann (Universität Potsdam) Contact: hole uni-potsdam.de
Message 2: Theoretical East Asian Linguistics 5
|
Date: 18-Apr-2008
From: Daniel Hole <hole uni-potsdam.de>
Subject: Theoretical East Asian Linguistics 5
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Theoretical East Asian Linguistics 5 Short Title: TEAL-5 Date: 10-Sep-2008 - 11-Sep-2008 Location: Potsdam, Germany Contact Person: Daniel Hole Meeting Email: teal5 ling.uni-potsdam.de Web Site: http://www.sfb632.uni-potsdam.de/conference/teal-5.pdf Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Semantics; Syntax Call Deadline: 30-Apr-2008 Meeting Description: We welcome submissions that address problems of East Asian linguistics from a theoretical perspective. A special session on 'Word-order variation and universal grammar - areal, dialectal and information-structural perspectives' will be held on the first day of the workshop. Each paper will be allotted 30 minutes for presentation and 15 minutes for discussion. Last Call for Papers - TEAL5 (Theoretical East Asian Linguistics) General Session: Submissions from any domain of grammar are welcome Special Session: 'Word-order variation and universal grammar - areal, dialectal and information-structural perspectives' Selection of papers is based on anonymous review of abstracts. A selection committee will be formed to review the submitted abstracts which are considered by the reviewers to be of high interest to the development of theoretical East Asian linguistics and linguistic theory in general. Please follow these guidelines to submit your abstracts: All submitted abstracts should be written in English and limited to two single-spaced pages, complete with examples and bibliography. All texts should fit within a US letter-size or A4 page, with 1-inch/2.5-cm margin all around. Each abstract should start with the title (centered) at top, followed by 3 single-spaced blank lines, above the main text. Use font size 12 throughout, preferably in Times or Times New Roman. Romanize all Asian texts, and avoid Asian character fonts unless absolutely necessary. Please leave your name and affiliation out of the abstract (but keep 3 blank lines between title and text). At most one single-authored work and one joint-authored work per person will be accepted for presentation. The body of your email message should include the following information: paper title name(s) of the author(s) affiliation(s) (a single) e-mail address for correspondence general session/special session [choose one] Abstract submission is by email-attachment only. We cannot accept submissions by postal mail. Save your abstract as a PDF, DOC, or RTF file. Documents in other formats must be converted before submission. Name your abstract with your last name followed by the suffix pdf, doc, or rtf (e.g., huang.pdf, kim.doc, or watanabe.rtf). Send your abstract to: teal5 ling.uni-potsdam.de The TEAL Workshop was first launched in 1990 at the University of California, Irvine as a mid-size workshop intended to foster research on East Asian linguistics. It has been an important forum for presenting new theories and exchanging novel ideas that bear on East Asian languages with theoretical interests. Since 2002, the TEAL Workshop has been an international event. It was held at Doshisha University, Japan in 2002, at National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan in 2004, and at Harvard University, USA in 2005. Last year TEAL was held in conjunction with the Sixth GLOW in Asia. Important dates: Deadline for abstract submissions: April 30th 2008 Notification of acceptance: June 15th 2008 Workshop: September 10th/11th 2008 Local organizers: Daniel Hole (Universität Potsdam) Malte Zimmermann (Universität Potsdam)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|