LINGUIST List 19.1267
|
Mon Apr 14 2008
Diss: Forensic Ling/Phonetics/Socioling: Fadden: 'Prosodic Profiles...'
Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter
<evelyn linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Lorna
Fadden,
Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews
Message 1: Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews
|
Date: 14-Apr-2008
From: Lorna Fadden <faddensfu.ca>
Subject: Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews
 E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: Simon Fraser University
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2008
Author: Lorna Fadden
Dissertation Title: Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews
Linguistic Field(s):
Forensic Linguistics
Phonetics
Sociolinguistics
Dissertation Director:
Nancy Hedberg
Sosa Juan
Murray Munro
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation presents a descriptive study of the prosodic
characteristics of suspects' speech during investigative interviews with
police. During police interviews, investigators direct conversation by
asking suspects questions and making assertions thereby placing the suspect
in the position of responding. Based on whether the suspect is a first-time
or repeat offender, and the type of information suspects produce, responses
are categorized and examined for their properties of pause, tempo, and pitch.
Response types explored in this study are affirmative, in which suspects
confirm information in the investigators' questions or assertions;
negative, in which information is rejected; relevant and irrelevant, in
which suspects offer information pertaining or not pertaining to the
investigators' questions; and confessions. Pausal features - response
latency, and pause-to-speech ratio - are found to differ across certain
response types in both groups. In general, for example, first time suspects
pause more than repeat offenders, both before and during turns,
particularly when offering relevant responses. Among the temporal features,
first-time suspects' speech and articulation rates are lower when producing
relevant information than repeat offenders' rates. Furthermore, first
timers' irrelevant temporal rates are higher than relevant temporal rates.
Pitch characteristics show less distinction across response types than
pause and tempo, although first time suspects' pitch values cluster
somewhat more neatly within response types than repeat offenders', whose
pitch values vary more widely.
The findings noted above are discussed in relation to previous studies that
address the prosodic characteristics of discourse and emotion. Furthermore,
on the basis of these findings, prosodic profiles of response categories
for first time offenders and repeat offenders are created. The potential
for forensic application of these profiles is discussed, particularly with
respect to deception.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
