LINGUIST List 18.2549|
Thu Aug 30 2007
Qs: Ability Modality in Mandarin and English
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Ability Modality in Mandarin and English
Message 1: Ability Modality in Mandarin and English
From: Zhiguo Xie <culinguistgmail.com>
Subject: Ability Modality in Mandarin and English
E-mail this message to a friend
I am trying to convince myself that ability modality in Mandarin has a
temporality presupposition while English does not. Towards this end, I am
looking for help from native speakers of Chinese and native speakers of
In English, is it good if, out of blue, someone utters "John was able to
finish the assignment yesterday' or "John could finish the assignment
yesterday' (focusing on the ability reading). Does the sentence convey any
contrastive meaning, like in such contexts as 'John was able to finish the
assignment, but he cannot do so today.'?
In Mandarin Chinese, are sentences (1) and (2), which both contain
past-denoting zuotian 'yesterday', acceptable in their ability reading?
(1) Zhangsan zuotian neng zuo wan zuoye
Z yesterday can do finish homework
(2) Zhangsan zuotian zuo de wan zuoye
Z yesterday do DE finish homework
Some people that I consulted reported to me that (1) and (2) would be
improved if we add elements like hai 'still' before neng (for (1)) and zuo
(for (2)), respectively. That seems to suggest that (1) and (2) are
marginal as they stand alone as above. But I really don't want to jump to
such a conclusion before consulting more native speakers.
Thank you very much.
Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.