* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.1118

Thu Apr 12 2007

Diss: Phonology: Borroff: 'A Landmark Underspecification Account of...'

Editor for this issue: Hunter Lockwood <hunterlinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Marianne Borroff, A Landmark Underspecification Account of the Patterning of Glottal Stop

Final Standing: Top 5 Schools in LL Grad School Challenge:
1. Stanford University $3270
2. University of Massachusetts at Amherst $2027
3. University of Arizona $1835
4. University of Washington $1474
5. University of California, Santa Barbara $1006
To see the full list, go to: http://linguistlist.org/donation/fund-drive2007/allschools.cfm


Message 1: A Landmark Underspecification Account of the Patterning of Glottal Stop
Date: 11-Apr-2007
From: Marianne Borroff <mlborroffgmail.com>
Subject: A Landmark Underspecification Account of the Patterning of Glottal Stop

Institution: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2007

Author: Marianne L. Borroff

Dissertation Title: A Landmark Underspecification Account of the Patterning of Glottal Stop

Dissertation URL: http://roa.rutgers.edu/view.php3?id=1289

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology

Dissertation Director:
Ellen Broselow
Marie K. Huffman

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation addresses the asymmetry in patterning between laryngeal
and supralaryngeal consonants. In this dissertation, I consider four
patterns: (1) required identity-across-glottals (in V1?V2, V1 = V2); (2)
hiatus resolution-like processes in V?V(V?V patterns with VV); (3)
prohibition of glottal stop from syllable onset or coda; and (4) temporal
instability of sequences with glottal stop (e.g. vowel intrusion: Vx?C ->
Vx?VxC,coalescence of C? to C'). I present a unified analysis of these
patterns within the frameworks of Articulatory Phonology (Browman and
Goldstein 1986, et seq.) and Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993),
in which utterances are comprised of abstract articulatory gestures (rather
than segments or features).

I argue that the exceptional behavior of glottal stop is a function of its
acoustic properties: in contrast to oral stop consonants, glottal stop does
not condition formant transitions, and therefore lacks the landmarks of
ONSET (marking the beginning of the gesture) and OFFSET (marking the end of
the gesture.) Based on data on temporal relations within syllables and
sequences (e.g. in Browman and Goldstein 2000, and others), I propose that
the ONSET and OFFSET landmarks are points of alignment for phasing
relations that underlie syllabification and sequentiality. Because it lacks
these crucial landmarks (the Landmark Underspecification proposal), glottal
stop cannot participate unambiguously in syllabic or sequential phasing

This approach provides an account of each of the patterns described above.
Hiatus resolution-across-glottals occurs because the glottal stop cannot
satisfy the constraint that requires syllable onsets to be precisely phased
with respect to the following vowel; glottal stop is therefore not a
satisfactory syllable onset. Languages in which the vowels flanking
laryngeal consonants are required to be identical exhibit a subset case of
the hiatus resolution pattern, differing only in the strategies employed to
repair hiatus. Similarly, glottal stop is disallowed pre- or
postvocalically in some languages because it cannot obey the constraints on
phasing of onset or coda consonants with respect to syllable nuclei.
Finally, the lack of clear cues to the temporal position of glottal stop
lead underlying sequences with glottal stop to surface non-sequentially,
manifested as vowel intrusion or as coalescence of the glottal stop with a
vowel or consonant.

Among the languages discussed are Yatzachi Zapotec (Otomanguean), Yucatec
Maya (Mayan), Kekchi (Mayan), Arbore (Cushitic), Tukang Besi
(Malayo-Polynesian), Kashaya (Pomoan) and Yurok (Algic).

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $55,000. This money will go to help keep the 
List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 2007 
LINGUIST List Superhero Adventure for some Fund Drive fun!


There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form.

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later.

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to donate by 
check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:


The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such can 
receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non Profit 
organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be offset against 
your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers only). For more 
information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any gift 
you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting your human 
resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills in and returns 
to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure that doubles the 
value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment 
to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.