LINGUIST List 16.2208|
Tue Jul 19 2005
Qs: Profglot Code; Discussion List for Journal Editors
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Discussion List for Journal Editors
Message 1: Profglot Code
From: Simon Courtenage <courteswestminster.ac.uk>
Subject: Profglot Code
I would like to find out if anyone has the code for Profglot that they
could send me (email address: courteswmin.ac.uk).
Dr. Simon Courtenage
Software Systems Engineering Research Group
Dept. of Software Engineering
Cavendish School of Computer Science
University of Westminster, London, UK
Web: http://users.cscs.wmin.ac.uk/~courtes/ | http://www.sse.wmin.ac.uk
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
Message 2: Discussion List for Journal Editors
From: Robert Dale <rdaleics.mq.edu.au>
Subject: Discussion List for Journal Editors
As editor of Computational Linguistics, I've often felt that it would be
useful to discuss issues and share knowledge with other journal editors.
I've been wondering if there's a discussion list out there for journal
editors; I've done a fair bit of googling in an attempt to find something,
but with no success.
Then it occurred to me that it's probably the case that the editors of most
journals in the linguistics space read Linguist. So: does anyone on the
list know of such a discussion list? And if not, if you're the editor of a
journal, would you be interested in being on such a list? If there's
sufficient interest I'll set one up.
This may be the kind of thing where a more or less discipline-specific
model is the way to go: there might be much to be gained from the editors
of all the journals of interest to a community (like the Linguist
community) having a common forum.
Any responses will be gratefully received, and if it looks like there is
anything there of general interest to the Linguist readership I'll post an
Linguistic Field(s): Not Applicable
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.