LINGUIST List 15.2641

Thu Sep 23 2004

Diss: Semantics: Kim: 'Event Structure...'

Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui <>


        1.    Min-Joo Kim, Event Structure and the Internally-headed Relative Clause Construction in Korean and Japanese

Message 1: Event Structure and the Internally-headed Relative Clause Construction in Korean and Japanese

Date: 23-Sep-2004
From: Min-Joo Kim <>
Subject: Event Structure and the Internally-headed Relative Clause Construction in Korean and Japanese

Institution: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 25-Jun-1905

Author: Min-Joo Kim

Dissertation Title: Event structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese

Linguistic Field(s):

Subject Language(s):
Japanese Language Code: JPN
Korean Language Code: KKN

Dissertation Director:
Kyle B Johnson
Angelika Kratzer
Christopher Potts
Ellen Woolford

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation investigates how syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors interact to produce the Internally-Headed Relative Clause (IHRC) construction in Korean and Japanese.

The IHRC construction differs from the more familiar Externally-Headed Relative Clause (EHRC) construction in several ways. First, unlike an EHRC, an IHRC's content restricts the content of the matrix clause rather than that of the semantic head. Second, its interpretation is heavily influenced by the discourse context in ways not seen with the EHRC. Third, unlike the head of an EHRC, the head of an IHRC does not correspond to any overt syntactic phrase and hence needs to be determined by language users based on the relative clause's content, the matrix predicate's semantics, and the discourse context.

The literature offers an abundance of sensitive analyses of the IHRC construction, but it leaves two central questions unanswered: what determines the interpretation of the construction? And, if pragmatic principles play a role, how do they interact with the morphosyntax and the semantics?

I answer these questions with an event-based semantic analysis. I show that the construction's interpretation is determined partly by grammatical factors (e.g., the embedded clause's aspect and the matrix predicate's semantics) and partly by pragmatic factors (the discourse context and the discourse participants' world knowledge). In particular, I isolate two sources of the semantic variability of the construction.

First, the matrix clause contains a pronominal definite description, whose denotation contains a free relation variable. The value of this variable is determined by the embedded clause's event structure, the matrix predicate's semantics, and the discourse context.

Second, the relative operator that occurs in this construction connects the content of the embedded clause with that of the matrix clause, establishing either a temporal or a causal relation between them, depending on whether the embedded clause describes a temporary state or a permanent state.

This study establishes important connections between the semantics of a definite description and event structure, thereby solving a particularly challenging formal-linking problem, one that afflicts existing E-type pronoun analyses of the IHRC construction. In addition, it provides a constrained but flexible interpretive mechanism for the construction, eliminating the need for many of the extra-grammatical constraints that characterize existing treatments.

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue