LINGUIST List 14.927

Fri Mar 28 2003

Qs: Ling and Literature, Phonology

Editor for this issue: Renee Galvis <>

FUND DRIVE 2003 To give you an incentive to donate, many of our Supporting Publishers have generously donated some amazing linguistic prizes. As a donor you are automatically entered into this prize draw. To find out what's on offer and the rules etc., visit: We still have a long way to go, however, to reach our target of $50,000. Please make a donation at: The LINGUIST List depends on the generous contributions from subscribers like you; we would not be able to operate without your help. The moderators, staff, and student editors at LINGUIST would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continuous support. We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at


  1. Yuri Tambovtsev, Linguistics and Literature
  2. Charles Hoequist, Jr., Phonology: interword vs. intraword coarticulation

Message 1: Linguistics and Literature

Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:53:58 +0600
From: Yuri Tambovtsev <>
Subject: Linguistics and Literature

Dear colleagues, 

could you send me the bibliography on the articles dealing with the
occurrence of gerund, participle 1 and verbal noun in the prose and
poetry of British, American, Australian and Canadian authors as the
features of style? Do you think that the frequency of the use of these
grammar forms may show different ways of thinking? Please, write me
to Looking forward to hearing from you soon to

Yours sincerely,
Yuri Tambovtsev

Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: Phonology: interword vs. intraword coarticulation

Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:43:42 +0100
From: Charles Hoequist, Jr. <>
Subject: Phonology: interword vs. intraword coarticulation

Dear Linguists,

I have been searching without success for empirical studies comparing
within-word and between-word coarticulation. The assumption, when it
is mentioned at all, is that a word boundary weakens or blocks
coarticulation, but I can find little to no measurement data or
perceptual studies (to be specific, one inconclusive conference

Does anyone have a suggestion where I might go digging?

I will post responses to the list if there is interest.

Thanks in advance,
-Charles Hoequist
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue