The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.
Ask-A-Linguist Message Details
|Subject:||secondary articulation vs assimilation|
|Question:||Hello guys I was teaching a linguistics class and I came across this topic ''secondary articulation''. It was the first time for me to hear the term. I had always known that the effect of a preceding or following sound is called ''assimilation''. But in the book I have , both terms seem to be different. I did some research on both terms, but I can't seem to reach a satisfying conclusion. It says that assimilation involves quality and SA involves just place of articulation. I find that so vague. So, is assimilation the broader term? In other words, is secondary articulation a type of assimilation?|
|Reply:||My understanding here is a bit hazy because it happens that the languages I know most about don't involve much "secondary articulation". But I think I'm right in saying that no, these two concepts stand for two sharply different things. Secondary articulation, so far as I remember, is a property of a single phonetic sound, which happens to involve complex articulatory gestures. Assimilation, on the other hand, is definitely a relationship between more than one adjacent sound: it is where one sound is changed to be more like a following or preceding sound. Geoffrey Sampson|
|Reply From:||Geoffrey Richard Sampson click here to access email|