LINGUIST List 19.2775
|
Thu Sep 11 2008
FYI: CUNY Linguistics Colloquium
Editor for this issue: Matthew Lahrman
<matt linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Nazik
Dinctopal,
CUNY Linguistics Colloquium
Message 1: CUNY Linguistics Colloquium
|
Date: 11-Sep-2008
From: Nazik Dinctopal <nazik.dinctopal gmail.com>
Subject: CUNY Linguistics Colloquium
E-mail this message to a friend
The first City University of New York (CUNY) Linguistics Colloquium of the fall semester will be held on: Thursday, September 18, 2008 at: 4:15 p.m. at: The CUNY Graduate Center – 365 Fifth Avenue – New York (room 6417) by: Bert Vaux (University of Cambridge) on: The Subset Principle vs. Power Maximisation in Phonological Acquisition ABSTRACT: Are the phonological generalisations formed by language learners upon exposure to underdetermined data sets (i) maximally broad (dictated by maximal representational efficiency, as in rule-based phonology of the SPE tradition), (ii) maximally specific (dictated by the Subset Principle, as in Hale and Reiss's 2008 ''The Phonological Enterprise'' and perhaps Tesar and Smolensky's 2000 ''Learnability in Optimality Theory''), or (iii) variable in scope, depending on (a) minimisation of uncertainty about future events (Gallistel) or (b) Bayesian comparison of competing hypotheses (Tenenbaum)? In this talk I present evidence that a hybrid of (iiia-b) best accounts for what we know about phonological acquisition (and in fact animal learning as a whole), and circumvents problems encountered by theory (i) with scope variation and theory (ii) with trajectories of diachronic change and flaws in applying Gold's subset reasoning to phonology.
Linguistic Field(s): Phonology
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|